Lemma › Guides › The ratio lemma in olympiad geometry: when to reach for it
Guide

The ratio lemma in olympiad geometry: when to reach for it

13 October 2026

Most people meet the ratio lemma once, as a line in someone else's solution, and file it as a trick. That is the wrong file. It is the single most useful bridge in triangle geometry between the two kinds of information a problem gives you: angles at a vertex and lengths on the opposite side. Every time a problem hands you one and asks about the other, this is the tool.

The difficulty is not the proof, which is two applications of the law of sines. It is noticing that the problem is asking you to cross that bridge at all.

The statement

Let DD be a point on side BCBC of triangle ABCABC. Then

BDDC=ABAC⋅sin⁡∠BADsin⁡∠DAC.\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{AB}{AC}\cdot\frac{\sin\angle BAD}{\sin\angle DAC}.

Since AB/AC=sin⁡C/sin⁡BAB/AC = \sin C/\sin B by the law of sines, the same thing in angles only is

BDDC=sin⁡∠BADsin⁡∠DAC⋅sin⁡Csin⁡B.\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{\sin\angle BAD}{\sin\angle DAC}\cdot\frac{\sin C}{\sin B}.

The first form is for when you know sides; the second is for when the problem has given you nothing but angles, which in olympiad geometry is most of the time.

Proof. In triangle ABDABD the law of sines gives BD/sin⁡∠BAD=AB/sin⁡∠ADBBD/\sin\angle BAD = AB/\sin\angle ADB. In triangle ACDACD it gives DC/sin⁡∠DAC=AC/sin⁡∠ADCDC/\sin\angle DAC = AC/\sin\angle ADC. The angles ∠ADB\angle ADB and ∠ADC\angle ADC are supplementary, so their sines are equal. Divide one equation by the other and that common sine cancels.

The same argument works when DD is on line BCBC but outside the segment, because the two angles at DD are then equal rather than supplementary, and the sines still match.

The four signals

The quickest test: look at what the problem told you and what it asks. If one is an angle at a vertex and the other is a split of the opposite side, you are on the bridge.

Watching it work

The angle bisector theorem is the zero case. If ADAD bisects ∠A\angle A, the two sines are equal and cancel, leaving BD/DC=AB/ACBD/DC = AB/AC. That is the angle bisector theorem, proved in one line. In the 1313–1414–1515 triangle with AB=13AB = 13, AC=15AC = 15 and BC=14BC = 14, the bisector from AA lands at BD=14⋅1328=6.5BD = 14\cdot\tfrac{13}{28} = 6.5 and DC=7.5DC = 7.5. The lemma also covers the external bisector, which meets line BCBC outside the segment in the same ratio 13:1513:15.

An angle split you cannot do with similar triangles. Take a right isosceles triangle with the right angle at AA, and a line from AA making 30∘30^\circ with ABAB and 60∘60^\circ with ACAC. Since AB=ACAB = AC, the lemma gives BD/DC=sin⁡30∘/sin⁡60∘=1/3BD/DC = \sin 30^\circ/\sin 60^\circ = 1/\sqrt3. Try finding a pair of similar triangles in that figure that gives the same answer. There is not an obvious one, and that is the point: similar triangles convert lengths to lengths, and the ratio lemma is what you use when the information arrived as an angle.

The symmedian in two lines. Reflect the median AMAM over the angle bisector to get a line AKAK. By the second signal, the median satisfies sin⁡∠BAM/sin⁡∠MAC=AC/AB\sin\angle BAM/\sin\angle MAC = AC/AB. Reflection swaps the two angles, so for AKAK the sine ratio is AB/ACAB/AC, and the lemma gives

BKKC=ABAC⋅ABAC=AB2AC2.\frac{BK}{KC} = \frac{AB}{AC}\cdot\frac{AB}{AC} = \frac{AB^2}{AC^2}.

In the 1313–1414–1515 triangle that splits BCBC as 169:225169:225. Without the lemma, this result usually costs a page.

Ceva, with angles

Multiply three copies of the lemma, one at each vertex, for cevians ADAD, BEBE, CFCF:

BDDC⋅CEEA⋅AFFB=sin⁡∠BADsin⁡∠DAC⋅sin⁡∠CBEsin⁡∠EBA⋅sin⁡∠ACFsin⁡∠FCB.\frac{BD}{DC}\cdot\frac{CE}{EA}\cdot\frac{AF}{FB} = \frac{\sin\angle BAD}{\sin\angle DAC}\cdot\frac{\sin\angle CBE}{\sin\angle EBA}\cdot\frac{\sin\angle ACF}{\sin\angle FCB}.

Every side length appears once on top and once underneath, so they all cancel. By Ceva's theorem the left side equals 11 exactly when the cevians are concurrent, so the right side does too. That is trigonometric Ceva, and it is nothing more than the ratio lemma used three times.

It makes the classic concurrency results almost free. For the angle bisectors, each sine ratio is 11, so they meet. For the medians, each length ratio is 11, so they meet, and the lemma tells you something the length form does not: how the median at each vertex splits that vertex angle. Choose whichever form matches the data the problem gave you.

Where it goes wrong

  1. Using the wrong angles. The angles in the lemma are the two pieces of ∠A\angle A on either side of the cevian, not the base angles. Write the cevian, then write which angle is on the BB side and which is on the CC side, before writing any sine.
  2. Forgetting the side ratio. BD/DC=sin⁡∠BAD/sin⁡∠DACBD/DC = \sin\angle BAD/\sin\angle DAC is only true when AB=ACAB = AC. The factor AB/ACAB/AC, or sin⁡C/sin⁡B\sin C/\sin B, is the part people drop under time pressure.
  3. Reaching for it when lengths are all you have. If the problem gives lengths and asks for lengths, the lemma introduces sines you then have to eliminate. Similar triangles or mass points are faster there.

What to do with this

Take five triangle problems that involve a cevian and, for each one, write only one line: what the problem gives you at the vertex, and what it wants on the opposite side. Where one is an angle and the other is a length, write the lemma with the right angles filled in. That line is usually most of the solution.

The Ceva and Menelaus page has the length form and mass points, which handle the all-lengths case. The problem archive has more cevian problems with full solutions, and the daily problem posts a new one every day in three tiers with no account needed.

Related guides

Train it on Lemma

Every technique here is taught explicitly, in order. 125 lessons, 1206 curated problems and unlimited generated practice at six difficulties. Free to start, no card, and every paid plan opens with 3 free days.

Find your level