The ratio lemma in olympiad geometry: when to reach for it
13 October 2026
Most people meet the ratio lemma once, as a line in someone else's solution, and file it as a trick. That is the wrong file. It is the single most useful bridge in triangle geometry between the two kinds of information a problem gives you: angles at a vertex and lengths on the opposite side. Every time a problem hands you one and asks about the other, this is the tool.
The difficulty is not the proof, which is two applications of the law of sines. It is noticing that the problem is asking you to cross that bridge at all.
The statement
Let be a point on side of triangle . Then
Since by the law of sines, the same thing in angles only is
The first form is for when you know sides; the second is for when the problem has given you nothing but angles, which in olympiad geometry is most of the time.
Proof. In triangle the law of sines gives . In triangle it gives . The angles and are supplementary, so their sines are equal. Divide one equation by the other and that common sine cancels.
The same argument works when is on line but outside the segment, because the two angles at are then equal rather than supplementary, and the sines still match.
The four signals
- A cevian defined by an angle, a question about lengths. "The line through making with meets at ; find ." No similar triangles exist in that figure. The ratio lemma answers it immediately.
- A cevian defined by a length, a question about angles. The converse direction. A median has , so the lemma says . That is a statement about how the median splits the angle at , and it is exactly what you need when the median is going to be reflected or rotated.
- Three cevians and the word "concurrent" in a problem full of angles. Ceva's theorem wants length ratios. If the problem only gave you angles, apply the lemma three times and multiply: the side lengths cancel in pairs and you are left with the trigonometric form of Ceva.
- Isogonal lines. Any time two lines through make equal angles with and , the lemma relates their two feet with almost no work, because the sines simply swap.
Watching it work
The angle bisector theorem is the zero case. If bisects , the two sines are equal and cancel, leaving . That is the angle bisector theorem, proved in one line. In the –– triangle with , and , the bisector from lands at and . The lemma also covers the external bisector, which meets line outside the segment in the same ratio .
An angle split you cannot do with similar triangles. Take a right isosceles triangle with the right angle at , and a line from making with and with . Since , the lemma gives . Try finding a pair of similar triangles in that figure that gives the same answer. There is not an obvious one, and that is the point: similar triangles convert lengths to lengths, and the ratio lemma is what you use when the information arrived as an angle.
The symmedian in two lines. Reflect the median over the angle bisector to get a line . By the second signal, the median satisfies . Reflection swaps the two angles, so for the sine ratio is , and the lemma gives
In the –– triangle that splits as . Without the lemma, this result usually costs a page.
Ceva, with angles
Multiply three copies of the lemma, one at each vertex, for cevians , , :
Every side length appears once on top and once underneath, so they all cancel. By Ceva's theorem the left side equals exactly when the cevians are concurrent, so the right side does too. That is trigonometric Ceva, and it is nothing more than the ratio lemma used three times.
It makes the classic concurrency results almost free. For the angle bisectors, each sine ratio is , so they meet. For the medians, each length ratio is , so they meet, and the lemma tells you something the length form does not: how the median at each vertex splits that vertex angle. Choose whichever form matches the data the problem gave you.
Where it goes wrong
- Using the wrong angles. The angles in the lemma are the two pieces of on either side of the cevian, not the base angles. Write the cevian, then write which angle is on the side and which is on the side, before writing any sine.
- Forgetting the side ratio. is only true when . The factor , or , is the part people drop under time pressure.
- Reaching for it when lengths are all you have. If the problem gives lengths and asks for lengths, the lemma introduces sines you then have to eliminate. Similar triangles or mass points are faster there.
What to do with this
Take five triangle problems that involve a cevian and, for each one, write only one line: what the problem gives you at the vertex, and what it wants on the opposite side. Where one is an angle and the other is a length, write the lemma with the right angles filled in. That line is usually most of the solution.
The Ceva and Menelaus page has the length form and mass points, which handle the all-lengths case. The problem archive has more cevian problems with full solutions, and the daily problem posts a new one every day in three tiers with no account needed.
Related guides
- Similar triangles: the ratio tricks that save timeSimilar triangles eat time when you write four-term proportions. One scale factor, the k-squared area rule and three shapes to memorise do the work in seconds.
- Ceva or Menelaus: when to use whichBoth theorems say a product of three ratios equals 1. Deciding which one you are looking at takes one question, and a counting rule when that question is hard.
- Power of a point: when to use it, and when not toPower of a point is a recognition problem, not a formula problem. Five tells that call for it, one that does not, and how to find the circle nobody drew.
- Angle chasing: when to stop and what to reach for insteadAngle chasing rarely fails outright. It finishes, and you keep going. Four signals that the chase is over, and what the conclusion says to reach for next.
Train it on Lemma
Every technique here is taught explicitly, in order. 125 lessons, 1206 curated problems and unlimited generated practice at six difficulties. Free to start, no card, and every paid plan opens with 3 free days.
Find your level